Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Rothermel

Ohio Supreme Court December 31, 1984

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Rothermel, 15 Ohio St. 3d 121 (Ohio 1984)

472 N.E.2d 1072; 15 Ohio B. 272; 1984 Ohio LEXIS 1275

Brown, Celebrezze, Holmes, Locher, Sweeney

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Inasmuch as respondent has filed no objections to the board’s recommendations, we agree that the appropriate sanction for respondent is a one-year suspension.

Accordingly, we adopt the findings and recommendations of the board and hereby suspend respondent from the practice of law for a period of one year.

Judgment accordingly.

Celebrezze, C.J., W. Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown and J. P. Celebrezze, JJ., concur.

Reference

Cited By: 8 cases
Status: Published