Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Ohio Supreme Court, 1984

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Rothermel

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Rothermel
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided December 31, 1984 · Brown, Celebrezze, Holmes, Locher, Sweeney
15 Ohio St. 3d 121; 472 N.E.2d 1072; 15 Ohio B. 272; 1984 Ohio LEXIS 1275

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Rothermel

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Inasmuch as respondent has filed no objections to the board’s recommendations, we agree that the appropriate sanction for respondent is a one-year suspension.

Accordingly, we adopt the findings and recommendations of the board and hereby suspend respondent from the practice of law for a period of one year.

Judgment accordingly.

Celebrezze, C.J., W. Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown and J. P. Celebrezze, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑