Ohio Supreme Court, 1984

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Rothermel

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided December 31, 1984 · Brown, Celebrezze, Holmes, Locher, Sweeney

15 Ohio St. 3d 121; 472 N.E.2d 1072; 15 Ohio B. 272; 1984 Ohio LEXIS 1275

Cases that cite this one

8 later published cases cite this decision.

State v. Cotton (Ohio Ct. App. 2015)
Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Rothermel (Ohio 2007)
Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Rothermel (Ohio 2004)
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Rothermel (Ohio 1999)
Disciplinary Counsel v. Rothermel (Ohio 1999)
Schluter v. Psl, Inc. , Unpublished Decision (2-3-1998) (Ohio Ct. App. 1998)
Windsor v. Ridge Electric Co., Inc., Unpublished Decision (2-2-1998) (Ohio Ct. App. 1998)
Doe v. First Presbyterian Church (Ohio Ct. App. 1998)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Inasmuch as respondent has filed no objections to the board’s recommendations, we agree that the appropriate sanction for respondent is a one-year suspension.

Accordingly, we adopt the findings and recommendations of the board and hereby suspend respondent from the practice of law for a period of one year.

Judgment accordingly.

Celebrezze, C.J., W. Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown and J. P. Celebrezze, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.