Ohio Supreme Court, 1985

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Klunk

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided April 24, 1985 · Brown, Celebrezze, Douglas, Holmes, Locher, Sweeney, Wright

17 Ohio St. 3d 43; 476 N.E.2d 1051; 17 Ohio B. 35; 1985 Ohio LEXIS 306

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Grievance Administrator v. August (Mich. 1991)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Upon a review of the record herein, it is the determination of the court that respondent has violated DR 1-102(A)(1), DR 1-102(A)(3), DR 1-102(A)(4) and DR 1-102(A)(6), and we hereby accept the recommendation of the board of commissioners.

Therefore, it is the order of the court that respondent be permanently disbarred from the practice of law in the state of Ohio. The court further orders that the costs of these proceedings shall be taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Celebrezze, C.J., Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown, Douglas and Wright, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.