Ohio Supreme Court, 1985

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Hughes

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Hughes
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided June 5, 1985 · Brown, Celebrezze, Douglas, Holmes, Locher, Sweeney, Wright
17 Ohio St. 3d 210; 478 N.E.2d 796; 17 Ohio B. 445; 1985 Ohio LEXIS 339
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Hughes

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Gov. Bar R. V(7) provides in part that “[a] person who has been suspended for an indefinite period from the practice of law and thereafter reinstated in the manner hereinafter provided should be disbarred upon being found guilty of subsequent misconduct.”

Our review of the record leads us to conclude that respondent violated DR 1-102(A)(3), (5) and (6) of the Code of Professional Responsibility.

Although the respondent was not reinstated after his indefinite *212suspension, we agree with the board that we have no option available but to impose a permanent disbarment of the respondent given the seriousness of his conviction of extortion and taking into consideration his prior violation of commingling funds. Respondent has moved from the United States, and has failed to file his affidavit of compliance and surrender his certificate of admission as ordered in the suspension entry.

Accordingly, we adopt the recommendation of the board of commissioners, and respondent is hereby permanently disbarred from the practice of law in the state of Ohio.

Judgment accordingly.

Celebrezze, C.J., Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown, Douglas and Wright, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.