Ohio Supreme Court, 1985

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Head

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided October 30, 1985 · Brown, Celebrezze, Douglas, Holmes, Locher, Sweeney, Wright

20 Ohio St. 3d 16; 484 N.E.2d 702; 20 Ohio B. 87; 1985 Ohio LEXIS 535

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Head (Ohio 1988)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Respondent was found guilty of a felony theft offense. Inasmuch as respondent has filed no objection to the recommendation of the board, we agree that the appropriate sanction for such egregious conduct is an indefinite suspension.

*18Accordingly, we adopt the findings and recommendations of the board and hereby suspend respondent from the practice of law for an indefinite period.

Judgment accordingly.

Celebrezze, C.J., Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown, Douglas and Wright, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.