Ohio Supreme Court, 1986

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Russo

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided January 2, 1986 · Brown, Celebrezze, Douglas, Holmes, Locher, Sweeney, Wright

21 Ohio St. 3d 15; 487 N.E.2d 296; 21 Ohio B. 278; 1986 Ohio LEXIS 514

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

L.J. Smith, Inc. v. Harrison Cty. Bd. of Revision (Slip Opinion) (Ohio 2014)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Having reviewed the record, findings of fact and conclusions of law of the board, this court determines that there are ample facts to justify the board’s findings that Russo violated DR 6-101(A)(3); 7-101(A)(l), (2) and (3); 7-102(A)(4), (5) and (6); 9-102(A) and (B); and 1-102(A)(3), (4), (5) and (6).

Accordingly, it is the judgment of this court that Russo be permanently disbarred from the practice of law.

Judgment accordingly.

Celebrezze, C.J., Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown, Douglas and Wright, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.