Ohio Supreme Court, 1986

Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Braddock

Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Braddock
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided January 2, 1986 · Brown, Celebrezze, Douglas, Holmes, Locher, Sweeney, Wright
21 Ohio St. 3d 30; 487 N.E.2d 308; 21 Ohio B. 290; 1986 Ohio LEXIS 518

Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Braddock

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Having reviewed the record, the findings of fact and conclusions of fact of the board, this court determines that there are ample facts to justify the board’s findings that Robert L. Braddock did in fact violate DR 1-102(A)(1), 1-102(A)(4), 6-101(A)(3), 7-101(A)(2), 7-101(A)(3), 7-102(A)(3), and Gov. Bar R. V(4).

Accordingly, it is the judgment of this court that respondent be indefinitely suspended from the practice of law and that the costs of these proceedings be taxed to him.

Judgment accordingly.

Celebrezze, C.J., Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown, Douglas and Wright, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.