Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Ohio Supreme Court, 1986

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Eacret

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Eacret
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided July 23, 1986 · Brown, Celebrezze, Douglas, Holmes, Locher, Sweeney, Wright
25 Ohio St. 3d 132; 495 N.E.2d 433; 25 Ohio B. 177; 1986 Ohio LEXIS 709

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Eacret

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

This court finds that respondent has violated DR 1-102(A)(1), a lawyer shall not violate a Disciplinary Rule; DR 1-102(A)(3), a lawyer shall not engage in illegal conduct involving moral turpitude; and DR 1-102(A)(6), a lawyer shall not engage in any other conduct that adversely reflects on his fitness to practice law.

We concur in the board’s conclusion regarding the appropriate sanction. Therefore, it is the order of this court that respondent be indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in the state of Ohio.

Judgment accordingly.

Celebrezze, C.J., Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown, Douglas and Wright, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑