Adams v. Humphreys
Cases that cite this one
16 later published cases cite this decision.
- State ex rel. Jones v. Warden, Belmont Corr. Inst. (Ohio Ct. App. 2021)
- State ex rel. Knuckles v. Lazaroff (Ohio Ct. App. 2014)
- Daggett v. Bradshaw (Ohio Ct. App. 2013)
- Tuel v. Miller (Ohio Ct. App. 2012)
- In re Peterson, 07-Ma-56 (4-5-2007) (Ohio Ct. App. 2007)
- Watson v. Wolfe, Unpublished Decision (10-4-2006) (Ohio Ct. App. 2006)
- State Ex Rel. Anderson v. Wichtman (Ohio Ct. App. 2005)
- Norris v. Konteh, Unpublished Decision (4-16-1999) (Ohio Ct. App. 1999)
- Casdorph v. Kohl (Ohio Ct. App. 1993)
- Reid v. Morris (Ohio Ct. App. 1990)
- Drake v. Houk, 07 Ma 206 (3-17-2008) (Ohio Ct. App. 2008)
- Everett v. Eberlin, Unpublished Decision (3-2-2007) (Ohio Ct. App. 2007)
- Schoolcraft v. Wolfe, Unpublished Decision (3-11-2005) (Ohio Ct. App. 2005)
- Womack v. Warden, Unpublished Decision (3-14-2005) (Ohio Ct. App. 2005)
- Wayne v. Bobby, Unpublished Decision (7-16-2003) (Ohio Ct. App. 2003)
- Bradley v. Wolfe, Unpublished Decision (12-19-2002) (Ohio Ct. App. 2002)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
While the facts here are sparse, leaving some doubt as to whether appellant’s conviction was the result of a trial or of a guilty plea, the dismissal of the habeas corpus action below was nonetheless proper because such action may not be used as a substitute for appeal. Stahl v. Shoemaker (1977), 50 Ohio St. 2d 351, 354 [4 O.O. 3d 485], and In re Piazza (1966), 7 Ohio St. 2d 102, 103 [36 O.O. 2d 84],
For reason of the foregoing, the judgment of the court of appeals is hereby affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.