Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Ohio Supreme Court, 1987

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Hastie

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Hastie
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided March 18, 1987 · Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Locher, Moyer, Sweeney, Wright
29 Ohio St. 3d 28; 505 N.E.2d 261; 29 Ohio B. 380; 1987 Ohio LEXIS 239

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Hastie

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Upon a full review of this matter, this court finds that the respondent has violated DR 1-102(A)(3), (4), (5) and (6), 6-101(A)(3), 7-101(A)(2), and 7-102(A)(3) and (5). This court hereby orders that the respondent be permanently disbarred from the practice of law in the state of Ohio.

It is further ordered that the costs of these proceedings be taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, Douglas, Wright and H. Brown, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑