Ohio Supreme Court, 1987

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Banig

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Banig
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided August 26, 1987 · Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Locher, Moyer, Sweeney, Wright
32 Ohio St. 3d 155; 512 N.E.2d 674; 1987 Ohio LEXIS 362

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Banig

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Having reviewed the record, the findings of fact, and conclusions of the board, this court determines that there are ample facts to justify the board’s finding that Ronald A. Banig did in fact violate the Disciplinary Rules as set forth above.

We concur in the recommendation of the board, and hereby indefinitely suspend respondent from the practice of law. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, Douglas, Wright and H. Brown, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.