State v. Zuranski

Ohio Supreme Court September 16, 1987

State v. Zuranski, 32 Ohio St. 3d 379 (Ohio 1987)

513 N.E.2d 753; 1987 Ohio LEXIS 399

Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Locher, Moyer, Sweeney, Wright

Opinion of the Court

This cause (court of appeals No. 50447) is allowed as to Proposition of Law No. XV only, and as so allowed is reversed on authority of State v. Penix (1987), 32 Ohio St. 3d 369, 513 N.E. 2d 744, and remanded to the trial court for resentencing in accordance with that decision.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Locher, Douglas, Wright and H. Brown, JJ., concur. Holmes, J., dissents.

Dissenting Opinion

Holmes, J,

dissenting. I dissent for the reasons stated in my dissenting opinion in State v. Penix (1987), 32 Ohio St. 3d 369, 513 N.E. 2d 744.

Reference

Full Case Name: The State of Ohio v. Zuranski
Cited By: 2 cases
Status: Published