Ohio Supreme Court, 1987

State v. Zuranski

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided September 16, 1987 · Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Locher, Moyer, Sweeney, Wright

32 Ohio St. 3d 379; 513 N.E.2d 753; 1987 Ohio LEXIS 399

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

State v. Springer (Ohio Ct. App. 1990)
State v. Denson (Ohio 1988)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

This cause (court of appeals No. 50447) is allowed as to Proposition of Law No. XV only, and as so allowed is reversed on authority of State v. Penix (1987), 32 Ohio St. 3d 369, 513 N.E. 2d 744, and remanded to the trial court for resentencing in accordance with that decision.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Locher, Douglas, Wright and H. Brown, JJ., concur. Holmes, J., dissents.

Dissenting Opinion

Holmes, J,

dissenting. I dissent for the reasons stated in my dissenting opinion in State v. Penix (1987), 32 Ohio St. 3d 369, 513 N.E. 2d 744.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.