Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Ohio Supreme Court, 1987

State v. Zuranski

State v. Zuranski
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided September 16, 1987 · Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Locher, Moyer, Sweeney, Wright
32 Ohio St. 3d 379; 513 N.E.2d 753; 1987 Ohio LEXIS 399

State v. Zuranski

Opinion of the Court

This cause (court of appeals No. 50447) is allowed as to Proposition of Law No. XV only, and as so allowed is reversed on authority of State v. Penix (1987), 32 Ohio St. 3d 369, 513 N.E. 2d 744, and remanded to the trial court for resentencing in accordance with that decision.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Locher, Douglas, Wright and H. Brown, JJ., concur. Holmes, J., dissents.

Dissenting Opinion

Holmes, J,

dissenting. I dissent for the reasons stated in my dissenting opinion in State v. Penix (1987), 32 Ohio St. 3d 369, 513 N.E. 2d 744.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑