Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Ohio Supreme Court, 1988

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Levin

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Levin
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided January 6, 1988 · Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Locher, Moyer, Only, Sweeney, Wright
35 Ohio St. 3d 4; 517 N.E.2d 892; 1988 Ohio LEXIS 5

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Levin

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

This court finds that respondent committed the disciplinary violations identified by the board. Accordingly, this court adopts the board’s recommendations. Respondent is hereby publicly reprimanded for the misconduct found by the board in D.D. No. 86-22. It is further ordered that respondent be indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in the state of Ohio for the misconduct found by the board in D.D. No. 87-3. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, Douglas and H. Brown, JJ., concur. Wright, J., concurs in judgment only.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑