Green Circle Growers, Inc. v. Lorain County Board of Revision
Cases that cite this one
11 later published cases cite this decision.
- Viola Assocs., L.L.C. v. Lorain Cty. Bd. of Revision (Ohio Ct. App. 2021)
- Metamora Elevator Co. v. Fulton County Board of Revision (Ohio 2015)
- City of Englewood v. Miami Valley Lighting, L.L.C. (Ohio Ct. App. 2009)
- Township of Monroe v. Gasko (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2004)
- Litton Systems, Inc. v. Tracy (Ohio 2000)
- Litton Sys., Inc. v. Tracy (Ohio 2000)
- Tuinier v. Bedford Charter Township (Mich. Ct. App. 1999)
- Hawkins v. Van Zandt County Appraisal District (Tex. App. 1992)
- Morton International, Inc. v. Auditing Division of the Utah State Tax Commission (Utah 1991)
- Thomas Steel Strip Corp. v. Limbach (Ohio 1991)
- Rotek, Inc. v. Limbach (Ohio 1990)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Real property is defined in R.C. 5701.02 which provides:
“As used in Title LVII of the Revised Code, ‘real property’ and ‘land’ include land itself, whether laid out in town lots or otherwise, all growing crops, including deciduous and evergreen trees, plants, and shrubs, with all things contained therein, and, unless otherwise specified, all buildings, structures, improvements, and fixtures of whatever kind on the land, and all rights and privileges belonging or appertaining thereto.”
The appellees claim that the greenhouses are structures on the land. The taxpayer argues that the greenhouses are “implements” used in the pursuit of horticulture. We find the greenhouses to be structures and hold in favor of the appellees.
The case presents a question of statutory construction. The definition of real property for taxation is governed by R.C. 5701.02. The statutory definition deviates from the traditional common-law distinction between realty and personalty. As we held in Shutter Bug v. Kosydar (1974), 40 Ohio St. 2d 99, 69 O.O. 2d 487, 321 N.E. 2d 239:
“Even if a structure or building located on land is personal property, such structure or building will, for purposes of taxation, be included -within the definition of ‘real property’ as that term is defined in R.C. 5701.02, unless the General Assembly has otherwise specified.”
Clearly these greenhouses are structures erected upon the taxpayer’s real estate. They are attached to the realty by placement of metal sleeves into post holes anchored in concrete.
The decision reached by the Board of Tax Appeals follows a growing line of precedent. Pittsburgh-Des Moines Steel Co. v. Lindley (1982), 1 Ohio St. 3d 15, 1 OBR 39, 437 N.E. 2d 302 (storage tanks which rest on a prepared foundation and which are utilized to store oil, chemicals and gasoline); Bobb Bros. v. Bd. of Revision (1976), 45 Ohio St. 2d 81, 74 O.O. 2d 195, 341 N.E. 2d 573 (concrete and metal silos used to store grain); Shutter Bug, supra (small kiosks placed on shopping center and bowling alley parking lots and used to conduct the business of selling film and film processing services); Parkbrook Golf Corp.
Accordingly we hold that a greenhouse attached to metal pipes which are imbedded in concrete is a structure and therefore defined as real property under R.C. 5701.02 for the purpose of ad valorem real estate taxation. The decision of the Board of Tax Appeals was neither unreasonable nor unlawful, and we affirm.
Decision affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.