Ohio Supreme Court, 1988

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Bica

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided March 16, 1988 · Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Locher, Moyer, Sweeney, Wright

35 Ohio St. 3d 264; 520 N.E.2d 221; 1988 Ohio LEXIS 60

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Bica (Ohio 1991)
In re Corrigan (Ohio 1989)
Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Gill (Ohio 1988)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

This court finds that respondent violated the aforementioned Disciplinary Rules. Accordingly, we adopt both the board’s findings and its recommendation. Respondent is hereby ordered indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Locher, Holmes and Wright, JJ., concur. *266Douglas and H. Brown, JJ., dissent.

Dissenting Opinion

H. Brown, J.,

dissenting. Taking into account the disciplinary violations in this case, I would suspend the respondent from the practice of law for a period of one year.

Douglas, J., concurs in the foregoing dissenting opinion.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.