Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Ohio Supreme Court, 1988

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Bica

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Bica
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided March 16, 1988 · Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Locher, Moyer, Sweeney, Wright
35 Ohio St. 3d 264; 520 N.E.2d 221; 1988 Ohio LEXIS 60

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Bica

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

This court finds that respondent violated the aforementioned Disciplinary Rules. Accordingly, we adopt both the board’s findings and its recommendation. Respondent is hereby ordered indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Locher, Holmes and Wright, JJ., concur. *266Douglas and H. Brown, JJ., dissent.

Dissenting Opinion

H. Brown, J.,

dissenting. Taking into account the disciplinary violations in this case, I would suspend the respondent from the practice of law for a period of one year.

Douglas, J., concurs in the foregoing dissenting opinion.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑