Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Bica

Ohio Supreme Court March 16, 1988

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Bica, 35 Ohio St. 3d 264 (Ohio 1988)

520 N.E.2d 221; 1988 Ohio LEXIS 60

Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Locher, Moyer, Sweeney, Wright

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

This court finds that respondent violated the aforementioned Disciplinary Rules. Accordingly, we adopt both the board’s findings and its recommendation. Respondent is hereby ordered indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Locher, Holmes and Wright, JJ., concur. *266Douglas and H. Brown, JJ., dissent.

Dissenting Opinion

H. Brown, J.,

dissenting. Taking into account the disciplinary violations in this case, I would suspend the respondent from the practice of law for a period of one year.

Douglas, J., concurs in the foregoing dissenting opinion.

Reference

Cited By: 3 cases
Status: Published