Bellman v. Jago

Ohio Supreme Court
Bellman v. Jago, 38 Ohio St. 3d 55 (Ohio 1988)
526 N.E.2d 308; 1988 Ohio LEXIS 218
Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Locher, Moyer, Sweeney, Wright

Bellman v. Jago

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Appellant raises the following constitutional issues: right to counsel, prosecutorial misconduct, right to a speedy trial, denial of due process, and effective assistance of counsel. All these issues are appropriately raised by appeal or through post-conviction relief proceedings under R.C. 2953.21 through 2953.23, but not *56by petition for habeas corpus. Habeas corpus “is not and never was a post-conviction remedy for the review of errors or irregularities of an accused’s conviction or for a retrial of the guilt or innocence of an accused. * * *” Walker v. Maxwell (1965), 1 Ohio St. 2d 136, 137, 30 O.O. 2d 487, 488, 205 N.E. 2d 394, 395.

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, Douglas, Wright and H. Brown, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
Bellman v. Jago, Supt.
Cited By
13 cases
Status
Published