Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Ohio Supreme Court, 1988

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. O'Neill

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. O'Neill
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided November 16, 1988 · Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Locher, Moyer, Sweeney, Wright
39 Ohio St. 3d 337; 530 N.E.2d 1317; 1988 Ohio LEXIS 369

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. O'Neill

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The record substantiates that respondent violated DR 1-102(A)(3) and 1-102(A)(4). Accordingly, we concur in the board’s findings and its recommendation. Respondent is hereby ordered indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, Douglas, Wright and H. Brown, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑