Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Ohio Supreme Court, 1988

State ex rel. Gaeta v. City of Cleveland

State ex rel. Gaeta v. City of Cleveland
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided November 16, 1988 · Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Locher, Moyer, Sweeney, Wright
39 Ohio St. 3d 340; 530 N.E.2d 1317; 1988 Ohio LEXIS 372

State ex rel. Gaeta v. City of Cleveland

Opinion of the Court

For the reasons stated in Gaeta v. Cleveland (1988), 39 Ohio St. 3d 338, 530 N.E. 2d 1316, decided this date, the appeal is dismissed as being moot.

Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, Douglas and Wright, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., and H. Brown, J., dissent.

Dissenting Opinion

H. Brown, J.,

dissenting. I dissent for the reasons stated in my dissent in Gaeta v. Cleveland, supra.

Moyer, C.J., concurs in the foregoing dissenting opinion.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑