Ohio Supreme Court, 1988

Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. Siewert

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided December 30, 1988 · Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Locher, Moyer, Sweeney, Wright

40 Ohio St. 3d 172; 532 N.E.2d 751; 1988 Ohio LEXIS 443

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Siewert (Ohio 2011)
Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. Siewert (Ohio 1990)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Having thoroughly reviewed the record, this court concurs that respondent violated DR 6-101 (A)(3), 7-101(A)(l), 7401(A)(2), 7401(A)(3), and Gov. Bar R. V(5). However, in light of respondent’s admitted alcoholism and his stated desire to obtain treatment for it, we believe the board’s recommendation to be in*174appropriate under the circumstances. Accordingly, we order that respondent be suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for two years, but that eighteen months of this penalty be suspended so that, if a monitor of his progress recommends same, respondent may be readmitted after six months. However, even if respondent is successful in being readmitted after this initial six-month period, his performance must still be monitored for the remainder of the two-year suspension. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, Douglas, Wright and H. Brown, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.