Dayton Bar Ass'n v. Sams
Ohio Supreme Court
Dayton Bar Ass'n v. Sams, 41 Ohio St. 3d 11 (Ohio 1989)
535 N.E.2d 298; 1989 Ohio LEXIS 14
Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Moyer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright
Dayton Bar Ass'n v. Sams
Opinion of the Court
We concur with the board’s findings and its recommendation. Accordingly, respondent is hereby suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for six months. Costs taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Dissenting Opinion
dissenting. I must respectfully dissent. Respondent’s gross violations of DR 1-102(A)(3) and DR 1-102(A)(6) were too serious to merit the sanction invoked by the majority. I would suspend respondent at a minimum for an eighteen-month period, and I would consider a period of probation thereafter.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Dayton Bar Association v. Sams
- Cited By
- 5 cases
- Status
- Published