Ohio Supreme Court, 1989

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Randall

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Randall
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided June 7, 1989 · Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Moyer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright
43 Ohio St. 3d 149; 539 N.E.2d 160; 1989 Ohio LEXIS 96
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Randall

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

We concur in the recommendation of the board. Respondent is hereby ordered indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Ohio. Prior to reinstatement, consideration is to be given to the respondent’s mental condition. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.