Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law

State ex rel. Eaton Corp. v. Lancaster

Ohio Supreme Court
State ex rel. Eaton Corp. v. Lancaster, 44 Ohio St. 3d 106 (Ohio 1989)
541 N.E.2d 64; 1989 Ohio LEXIS 152
Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Moyer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright

State ex rel. Eaton Corp. v. Lancaster

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

On authority of State, ex rel. Peabody Coal Co., v. Indus. Comm. (1989), 44 Ohio St. 3d 104, 541 N.E. 2d 74, we hereby grant Surplus Fund reimbursement in case Nos. 87-622, 87-1887, 88-205 and 88-1312 for all amounts of temporary total compensation paid to the claimants herein subsequent to the respective findings of permanency.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Concurring Opinion

Douglas, J.,

concurring. I am pleased to see the majority of the court reverse itself and adopt the position *107set forth in my concurrence (joined in by Justice Sweeney) in the original decision in these cases as reported in State, ex rel. Eaton Corp., v. Lancaster (1988), 40 Ohio St. 3d 404, 416-417, 534 N.E. 2d 46, 58. Obviously, I concur in the majority opinion,

Sweeney, J., concurs in the foregoing concurring opinion.

Reference

Full Case Name
The State, ex rel. Eaton Corporation v. Lancaster (Two cases.) The State, ex rel. GCC Beverages, Inc. v. Industrial Commission of Ohio, The State, ex rel. Firestone Tire & Rubber Company v. Industrial Commission of Ohio
Cited By
11 cases
Status
Published
↑