Ohio Supreme Court, 1989

State ex rel. Eaton Corp. v. Lancaster

State ex rel. Eaton Corp. v. Lancaster
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided July 12, 1989 · Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Moyer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright
44 Ohio St. 3d 106; 541 N.E.2d 64; 1989 Ohio LEXIS 152

State ex rel. Eaton Corp. v. Lancaster

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

On authority of State, ex rel. Peabody Coal Co., v. Indus. Comm. (1989), 44 Ohio St. 3d 104, 541 N.E. 2d 74, we hereby grant Surplus Fund reimbursement in case Nos. 87-622, 87-1887, 88-205 and 88-1312 for all amounts of temporary total compensation paid to the claimants herein subsequent to the respective findings of permanency.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Concurring Opinion

Douglas, J.,

concurring. I am pleased to see the majority of the court reverse itself and adopt the position *107set forth in my concurrence (joined in by Justice Sweeney) in the original decision in these cases as reported in State, ex rel. Eaton Corp., v. Lancaster (1988), 40 Ohio St. 3d 404, 416-417, 534 N.E. 2d 46, 58. Obviously, I concur in the majority opinion,

Sweeney, J., concurs in the foregoing concurring opinion.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.