Ohio Supreme Court, 1989

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Caywood

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Caywood
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided November 15, 1989 · Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Moyer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright
46 Ohio St. 3d 186; 546 N.E.2d 411; 1989 Ohio LEXIS 282

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Caywood

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

We agree with the board’s findings and recommendation. Accordingly, we suspend respondent from the practice of law for two years but stay the suspension pending his successful completion of two years of monitored probation. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.