Ohio Supreme Court, 1989

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Caywood

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided November 15, 1989 · Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Moyer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright

46 Ohio St. 3d 186; 546 N.E.2d 411; 1989 Ohio LEXIS 282

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Caywood (Ohio 1996)
Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v. Caywood (Ohio 1994)
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Caywood (Ohio 1993)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

We agree with the board’s findings and recommendation. Accordingly, we suspend respondent from the practice of law for two years but stay the suspension pending his successful completion of two years of monitored probation. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.