State v. Radar
Cases that cite this one
7 later published cases cite this decision.
- Copeco, Inc. v. Caley (Ohio 1994)
- Santana v. Auto-Owners Insurance (Ohio 1994)
- Santana v. Auto-Owners Ins. Co. (Ohio 1994)
- Copeco, Inc. v. Caley (Ohio 1994)
- Freeman v. Holzer Medical Center (Ohio 1993)
- Freeman v. Holzer Med. Ctr. (Ohio 1993)
- State v. Parobek (Ohio 1990)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
This cause came before this court upon the certification of the court of appeals that its judgment conflicted with the judgment of the Court of Appeals for the Fifth District in State v. Howell (1981), 5 Ohio App. 3d 92, 5 OBR 206, 449 N.E. 2d 523, upon the following question:
“* * *[W]hether a judgment may be reversed and the cause remanded when a trial court errs in granting a motion to amend the indictment to less than bulk amount under R.C. 2925.03(A)(1), where the defendant plead [sic] no contest to a charge of aggravated trafficking, and the evidence shows possession of more than bulk amount.”
We find that the judgments of the courts of appeals do not conflict on the certified question. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. State v. Palider (1987), 33 Ohio St. 3d 68, 514 N.E. 2d 873; Cook v. Mayfield (1988), 37 Ohio St. 3d 44, 523 N.E. 2d 502; Hays v. St. Elizabeth Hosp. Medical Ctr. (1988), 38 Ohio St. 3d 60, 526 N.E. 2d 307.
Dissenting Opinion
dissenting. I would retain jurisdiction and affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.