Ohio Supreme Court, 1990

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Hipp

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Hipp
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided January 10, 1990 · Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Moyer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright
48 Ohio St. 3d 16; 548 N.E.2d 947; 1990 Ohio LEXIS 20
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Hipp

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

We agree that respondent violated DR 1-102(A)(3), 1-102(A)(4), 1-102(A)(5), 6-101(A)(3), 9-102(A) and 9-102(B), and we adopt the board’s recommendation. Respondent is indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.