Ohio Supreme Court, 1990

In re Neville for Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Prosequendum

In re Neville for Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Prosequendum
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided March 7, 1990 · Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Moyer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright
49 Ohio St. 3d 223; 551 N.E.2d 955; 1990 Ohio LEXIS 96
In re Neville for Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Prosequendum

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals for Columbiana County is affirmed on authority of In repetition of Brown (1990), 49 Ohio St. 3d 222, 551 N.E. 2d 954.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.