Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Grote
Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Grote
50 Ohio St. 3d 156; 553 N.E.2d 657; 1990 Ohio LEXIS 170
Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Grote
Opinion of the Court
We agree that respondent violated DR. 1-102(A)(4) and 6-101(A)(3). However, we find respondent’s misconduct deserving of a more severe sanction than that recommended by the board. Accordingly, respondent is hereby ordered suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for one year. Costs taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.