Ohio Supreme Court, 1990

Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Grote

Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Grote
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided April 18, 1990 · Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Moyer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright
50 Ohio St. 3d 156; 553 N.E.2d 657; 1990 Ohio LEXIS 170
Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Grote

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

We agree that respondent violated DR. 1-102(A)(4) and 6-101(A)(3). However, we find respondent’s misconduct deserving of a more severe sanction than that recommended by the board. Accordingly, respondent is hereby ordered suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for one year. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.