Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Ohio Supreme Court, 1990

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Williams

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Williams
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided May 9, 1990 · Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Moyer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright
51 Ohio St. 3d 36; 553 N.E.2d 1082; 1990 Ohio LEXIS 205

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Williams

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Having thoroughly reviewed the record, we agree with the-board’s findings of misconduct and its recommendation. Accordingly, respondent is hereby publicly reprimanded for having violated DR 5-103(A), 5-107(A)(l), and 1-102(A)(5). Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑