Ohio Supreme Court, 1990

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Williams

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Williams
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided May 9, 1990 · Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Moyer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright
51 Ohio St. 3d 36; 553 N.E.2d 1082; 1990 Ohio LEXIS 205
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Williams

Cases that cite this one

5 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Having thoroughly reviewed the record, we agree with the-board’s findings of misconduct and its recommendation. Accordingly, respondent is hereby publicly reprimanded for having violated DR 5-103(A), 5-107(A)(l), and 1-102(A)(5). Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.