Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Freeman

Ohio Supreme Court
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Freeman, 51 Ohio St. 3d 98 (Ohio 1990)
554 N.E.2d 1320; 1990 Ohio LEXIS 225
Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Moyer, Snick, Sweeney, Wright

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Freeman

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Having thoroughly reviewed this record, we agree that respondent violated DR 6-101(A)(3) and 1-102(A)(6). We also agree with the board’s recommendation. Accordingly, respondent is hereby suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for six months, but this sanction is suspended on the condition that he satisfactorily completes a two-year monitored probation period and complies with the five requirements enumerated in the panel’s opinion. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Re snick, JJ., concur.

Reference

Cited By
1 case
Status
Published