Ohio Supreme Court, 1990

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Freeman

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided May 23, 1990 · Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Moyer, Snick, Sweeney, Wright

51 Ohio St. 3d 98; 554 N.E.2d 1320; 1990 Ohio LEXIS 225

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Columbus Bar Assn. v. Bulson (Ohio 2023)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Having thoroughly reviewed this record, we agree that respondent violated DR 6-101(A)(3) and 1-102(A)(6). We also agree with the board’s recommendation. Accordingly, respondent is hereby suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for six months, but this sanction is suspended on the condition that he satisfactorily completes a two-year monitored probation period and complies with the five requirements enumerated in the panel’s opinion. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Re snick, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.