Ohio Supreme Court, 1990

In re Application of Stineman

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided June 27, 1990 · Brown, Douglas, Fourth, Holmes, Moyer, Resnick, Stephenson, Sweeney, Wright

52 Ohio St. 3d 88; 556 N.E.2d 184; 1990 Ohio LEXIS 269

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

State v. Lail (Ohio Ct. App. 2011)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

We agree with the board’s findings and its recommendation. Accordingly, applicant’s application for admission without examination is hereby denied. However, applicant is permitted to reapply for admission. He shall undergo further character and fitness examination and, if approved, be required to take the Ohio bar examination.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Stephenson, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur. Earl E. Stephenson, J., of the Fourth Appellate District, sitting for Wright, J.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.