Ohio Supreme Court, 1990

Stark County Bar Ass'n v. Russell

Stark County Bar Ass'n v. Russell
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided July 3, 1990 · Brown, Douglas, First, Holmes, Moyer, Resnick, Shannon, Sweeney, Wright
52 Ohio St. 3d 211; 556 N.E.2d 499; 1990 Ohio LEXIS 284
Stark County Bar Ass'n v. Russell

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Having thoroughly reviewed the instant record, we agree with the board’s findings of misconduct. We find the board’s recommendation appropriate. Therefore, we order that respondent be suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for one year. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Shannon, Holmes, Douglas and Wright, JJ., concur. H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., dissent. Raymond E. Shannon, 3., of the First Appellate District, sitting for Sweeney, J.

Dissenting Opinion

H. Brown, J.,

dissenting. In my opinion, the appropriate sanction in this cause should be a one-year suspension with six months of that period suspended.

Resnick, J., concurs in the foregoing dissenting opinion.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.