Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Immelt

Ohio Supreme Court November 7, 1990

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Immelt, 55 Ohio St. 3d 17 (Ohio 1990)

562 N.E.2d 888; 1990 Ohio LEXIS 1388

Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Moyer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Having thoroughly reviewed the record in this case, we *18concur in the board’s findings that respondent violated DR 1-102(A)(3), (4), and (5), and 9-102(B)(4). We also agree with the board’s recommendation. Therefore, we order that respondent be indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Ohio. Respondent is further ordered to show complete restitution and adequate recovery upon any application he makes for readmission to the Ohio Bar. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright and H. Brown, JJ., concur. Resnick, J., dissents.

Dissenting Opinion

Resnick, J.,

dissenting. The conduct of the respondent merits his disbarment.

Reference

Cited By: 3 cases
Status: Published