Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Ohio Supreme Court, 1990

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Crane

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Crane
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided December 12, 1990 · Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Moyer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright
56 Ohio St. 3d 38; 564 N.E.2d 96; 1990 Ohio LEXIS 1711

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Crane

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

We find respondent’s conduct to be a violation of DR 1-102(A)(4) and (5) and concur in the recommendation of the board. Respondent is hereby indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Ohio, without credit for the time already suspended. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑