Ohio Supreme Court, 1990

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Giegel

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided December 12, 1990 · Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Moyer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright

56 Ohio St. 3d 58; 564 N.E.2d 84; 1990 Ohio LEXIS 1719

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Ball (Ohio 1993)
Disciplinary Counsel v. Ball (Ohio 1993)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

We concur with the board’s findings and recommendations. Respondent is hereby indefinitely suspended from the practice of law. Moreover, the court admonishes respondent that in any application for reinstatement, the court will look for proof that respondent has resolved his alcohol abuse problems and made restitution to persons injured by his misconduct. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.