Ohio Supreme Court, 1990

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Giegel

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Giegel
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided December 12, 1990 · Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Moyer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright
56 Ohio St. 3d 58; 564 N.E.2d 84; 1990 Ohio LEXIS 1719

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Giegel

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

We concur with the board’s findings and recommendations. Respondent is hereby indefinitely suspended from the practice of law. Moreover, the court admonishes respondent that in any application for reinstatement, the court will look for proof that respondent has resolved his alcohol abuse problems and made restitution to persons injured by his misconduct. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.