Hope v. Highland County Board
Cases that cite this one
5 later published cases cite this decision.
- Commonwealth Upscale Properties, L.L.C. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision (Ohio Ct. App. 2021)
- Ross v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision (Slip Opinion) (Ohio 2018)
- Berea City School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision (Ohio Ct. App. 2012)
- Reserve Building Associates, Ltd. v. McCormack (Ohio Ct. App. 1995)
- Van De Hey v. Ashtabula Cty. Aud. (Ohio Ct. App. 2023)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Adherence to the provisions of the appellate statutes is essential to confer jurisdiction upon the BTA to hear appeals. American Restaurant & Lunch Co. v. Bowers (1946), 147 Ohio St. 147, 34 O.O. 8, 70 N. E. 2d 93. R.C. 5717.01 is specific and mandatory. It requires that notice of appeal be filed by the appellant both with the board of revision and with the BTA. Failure to comply with the appellate statute is fatal to the appeal. Austin Co. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision (1989), 46 Ohio St. 3d 192, 546 N.E. 2d 404. See, also, Fineberg v. Kosydar (1975), 44 Ohio St. 2d 1, 73 O. O. 2d 1, 335 N.E. 2d 705; and Zephyr Room, Inc. v. Bowers (1955), 164 Ohio St. 287, 58 O.O. 67, 130 N.E. 2d 362.
The decision of the BTA is neither unreasonable nor unlawful and it is hereby affirmed.
Decision affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.