Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Lange

Ohio Supreme Court January 9, 1991

Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Lange, 57 Ohio St. 3d 43 (Ohio 1991)

564 N.E.2d 1069; 1991 Ohio LEXIS 17

Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Moyer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Upon a careful review of the record, we agree with the board’s findings and recommendation. Respondent is therefore publicly reprimanded for having violated DR 1-102(A)(4) and 7-102(A)(5). Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Sweeney, Douglas, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., Holmes and Wright, JJ., dissent.

Dissenting Opinion

Wright, J.,

dissenting. I would order a sanction of a six-month suspension against respondent.

Moyer, C.J., and Holmes, J., concur in the foregoing dissenting opinion.

Reference

Full Case Name: Cincinnati Bar Association v. Lange
Cited By: 2 cases
Status: Published