Ohio Supreme Court, 1991

Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Lange

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided January 9, 1991 · Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Moyer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright

57 Ohio St. 3d 43; 564 N.E.2d 1069; 1991 Ohio LEXIS 17

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. Cox (Ohio 2003)
Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Lange (Ohio 1995)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Upon a careful review of the record, we agree with the board’s findings and recommendation. Respondent is therefore publicly reprimanded for having violated DR 1-102(A)(4) and 7-102(A)(5). Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Sweeney, Douglas, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., Holmes and Wright, JJ., dissent.

Dissenting Opinion

Wright, J.,

dissenting. I would order a sanction of a six-month suspension against respondent.

Moyer, C.J., and Holmes, J., concur in the foregoing dissenting opinion.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.