State ex rel. McKim v. Hobart Corp.
State ex rel. McKim v. Hobart Corp.
58 Ohio St. 3d 99; 568 N.E.2d 670; 1991 Ohio LEXIS 619
State ex rel. McKim v. Hobart Corp.
Opinion of the Court
Appellant seeks a writ of mandamus from what is essentially an interlocutory discovery order. Mandamus, however, does not lie from such orders. State, ex rel. Sobczak, v. Skow (1990), 49 Ohio St. 3d 13, 550 N.E. 2d 455.
For the reason stated above, the judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.