Ohio Supreme Court, 1991

Penrod v. Prosecuting Attorney

Penrod v. Prosecuting Attorney
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided April 24, 1991 · Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Moyer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright
59 Ohio St. 3d 602; 571 N.E.2d 436; 1991 Ohio LEXIS 953

Penrod v. Prosecuting Attorney

Opinion of the Court

The appeal is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed.

Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., dissents.

Dissenting Opinion

Moyer, C.J.,

dissenting. I would affirm the judgment of the court of appeals for the reasons stated in that court’s opinion rendered on April 3, 1990.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.