Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Rost
Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Rost
60 Ohio St. 3d 99; 573 N.E.2d 71; 1991 Ohio LEXIS 1243
Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Rost
Dissenting Opinion
dissenting. I would order a six-month suspension, but would suspend same pending respondent’s successful completion of a six-month supervised and monitored probation period.
Opinion of the Court
We concur with the findings of the board; however, we modify the sanction. Respondent is publicly reprimanded. Costs taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Dissenting Opinion
dissenting. I believe the facts in this case justify a penalty substantially greater than a public reprimand, to wit, six months’ actual suspension.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.