Ohio Supreme Court, 1991

State ex rel. Tran v. McMackin

State ex rel. Tran v. McMackin
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided December 4, 1991 · Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Moyer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright
62 Ohio St. 3d 165; 580 N.E.2d 782; 1991 Ohio LEXIS 2792
State ex rel. Tran v. McMackin

Cases that cite this one

6 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

On appeal, appellant argues that his conviction was obtained through fraud and trickery of the state and his court-appointed counsel. These allegations do not attack the jurisdiction of the sentencing court and are not grounds for issuing a writ of habeas corpus. See R.C. 2725.05 and State, ex rel. Justice, v. McMackin (1990), 53 Ohio St.3d 72, 558 N.E.2d 1183.

Accordingly, the judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.