State ex rel. Weiss v. Indus. Comm.

Ohio Supreme Court December 31, 1991

State ex rel. Weiss v. Indus. Comm., 62 Ohio St. 3d 1489 (Ohio 1991)

582 N.E.2d 998; 1991 Ohio LEXIS 4381

Douglas, Sweeney, Wright

Opinion of the Court

In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus. Upon consideration of respondents’ motion for protective order and/or for extension,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that said motion for protective order be, and the same is hereby, denied, effective December 30, 1991.

Dissenting Opinion

Sweeney, J.,

dissents and would grant the protective order pending the determination of respondents’ motion to dismiss. If the motion to dismiss is denied, the protective order should be lifted and respondents should be given an additional fourteen days to respond to relator’s discovery request.

Douglas and Wright, JJ., dissent.

Reference

Full Case Name: State, ex rel. Weiss v. Indus. Comm.
Status: Published