Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Friedman
Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Friedman
Opinion of the Court
After a thorough review of the record, we find that respondent has violated the Disciplinary Rules set forth above. Although respondent improperly commingled funds, exercised poor judgment, and was careless in his dealings with clients, he made full disclosure immediately when each matter was called to his attention by the bankruptcy court. All assets were ultimately discovered and full restitution was made to all parties; no individuals have been permanently harmed by respondent’s behavior. Respondent has taken advantage of continuing legal education to improve his knowledge of bankruptcy law. Even though a series of violations have occurred, we do not discern a pattern of intentional misconduct. Accordingly,
Judgment accordingly.
Dissenting Opinion
dissenting. I respectfully dissent. Like the board, I note “a sustained pattern of abuse, fraud, and deception of the courts.” (Emphasis added.) Accordingly, I would suspend respondent indefinitely.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Cincinnati Bar Association v. Friedman
- Status
- Published