Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Ohio Supreme Court, 1992

State v. Meadows

State v. Meadows
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided March 4, 1992 · Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Moyer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright
63 Ohio St. 3d 135; 585 N.E.2d 830; 1992 Ohio LEXIS 238

State v. Meadows

Opinion of the Court

The cause is affirmed on the authority of State v. Murnahan (1992), 63 Ohio St.3d 60, 584 N.E.2d 1204. However, defendant-appellant may file for delayed reconsideration of his ineffectiveness-of-counsel claim in the Hamilton County Court of Appeals.

Moyer, C.J., Holmes, Douglas and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Dissenting Opinion

Sweeney, J.,

dissents based on his dissent in State v. Murnahan (1992), 63 Ohio St.3d 60, 584 N.E.2d 1204.

Wright and H. Brown, JJ., dissent.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑