State v. Meadows

Ohio Supreme Court March 4, 1992

State v. Meadows, 63 Ohio St. 3d 135 (Ohio 1992)

585 N.E.2d 830; 1992 Ohio LEXIS 238

Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Moyer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright

Opinion of the Court

The cause is affirmed on the authority of State v. Murnahan (1992), 63 Ohio St.3d 60, 584 N.E.2d 1204. However, defendant-appellant may file for delayed reconsideration of his ineffectiveness-of-counsel claim in the Hamilton County Court of Appeals.

Moyer, C.J., Holmes, Douglas and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Dissenting Opinion

Sweeney, J.,

dissents based on his dissent in State v. Murnahan (1992), 63 Ohio St.3d 60, 584 N.E.2d 1204.

Wright and H. Brown, JJ., dissent.

Reference

Full Case Name: The State of Ohio v. Meadows
Cited By: 1 case
Status: Published