Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Ohio Supreme Court, 1992

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Slavens

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Slavens
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided March 11, 1992 · Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Moyer, Resnick, Respondent, Sweeney, Wright
63 Ohio St. 3d 162; 586 N.E.2d 92; 1992 Ohio LEXIS 265

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Slavens

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Our review of the record supports the board’s findings and its recommendation. Therefore, we order that respondent be indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Ohio with appropriate restitution to be *164made prior to any application respondent files for reinstatement to the practice of law. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Douglas and H. Brown, JJ., concur. Holmes, Wright and Resnick, JJ., dissent and would disbar respondent.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑