Ohio Supreme Court, 1992

In re Carr-Williams

In re Carr-Williams
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided June 10, 1992 · Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Moyer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright
63 Ohio St. 3d 752; 591 N.E.2d 693; 1992 Ohio LEXIS 1321
In re Carr-Williams

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Having reviewed the record, we agree with the board’s finding that Gail P. Carr-Williams has not established her present eligibility for admission to the practice of law in Ohio. We also agree with the board’s recommendation. Therefore, Carr-Williams’ application is disapproved, and she may reapply pursuant to the conditions stated by the board.

Order accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.