Ohio Supreme Court, 1992

Annarino v. Annarino

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided February 19, 1992 · Brown, Discussing, Douglas, Forth, Holmes, Moyer, Propositions, Resnick, Sweeney, Would, Wright

63 Ohio St. 3d 1201; 584 N.E.2d 1218; 1992 Ohio LEXIS 218

Opinion of the Court

This cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed.

The court orders that the court of appeals’ opinion not be published in the Ohio Official Reports, and that it may not be cited as authority except by the parties inter se.

Sweeney, Holmes, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., would affirm the court of appeals with an opinion discussing the propositions of law set forth. Douglas, J., dissents.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.