Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Baer

Ohio Supreme Court June 17, 1992

Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Baer, 64 Ohio St. 3d 32 (Ohio 1992)

591 N.E.2d 1209; 1992 Ohio LEXIS 1339

Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Moyer, Reprimand, Resnick, Sanction, Sweeney, Wright

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

We agree with the board’s findings and recommendation. Accordingly, we order that respondent be suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for a period of six months. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

*35Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright and Resnick, JJ., concur. H. Brown, J., dissents. Herbert R. Brown, J., dissenting. I believe that a public reprimand is the appropriate sanction.

Reference

Full Case Name: Columbus Bar Association v. Baer
Cited By: 2 cases
Status: Published