Ohio Supreme Court, 1992

Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Baer

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided June 17, 1992 · Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Moyer, Reprimand, Resnick, Sanction, Sweeney, Wright

64 Ohio St. 3d 32; 591 N.E.2d 1209; 1992 Ohio LEXIS 1339

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Baer (Ohio 1993)
Columbus Bar Assn. v. Baer (Ohio 1993)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

We agree with the board’s findings and recommendation. Accordingly, we order that respondent be suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for a period of six months. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

*35Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright and Resnick, JJ., concur. H. Brown, J., dissents. Herbert R. Brown, J., dissenting. I believe that a public reprimand is the appropriate sanction.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.