State ex rel. Richard v. Wells
Cases that cite this one
25 later published cases cite this decision.
- State ex rel. Feagin v. May (Ohio Ct. App. 2024)
- State ex rel. Ames v. Summit Cty. Court of Common Pleas (Slip Opinion) (Ohio 2020)
- State ex rel. Thomas v. Harnett (Ohio Ct. App. 2019)
- State ex rel. Williams v. Sutula (Ohio Ct. App. 2012)
- State v. Foster (Ohio Ct. App. 2012)
- In re Williams v. Pianka (Ohio Ct. App. 2012)
- State ex rel. Pettway v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common Pleas (Ohio Ct. App. 2012)
- State v. Perry, 92873 (3-30-2009) (Ohio Ct. App. 2009)
- State Ex Rel. Lisboa v. McCafferty, 92752 (3-9-2009) (Ohio Ct. App. 2009)
- Gallagher v. Padgett, Unpublished Decision (9-4-2007) (Ohio Ct. App. 2007)
- State v. Jenkins, Unpublished Decision (9-10-2002) (Ohio Ct. App. 2002)
- State Ex Rel. Jester v. Sutula, Unpublished Decision (10-3-2002) (Ohio Ct. App. 2002)
- State Ex Rel. Rakoczy v. Burnside, Unpublished Decision (7-30-2002) (Ohio Ct. App. 2002)
- State Ex Rel. Richards v. Fuerst, Unpublished Decision (10-3-2002) (Ohio Ct. App. 2002)
- State ex rel. Rodriguez v. Lorain County Joint Vocational School (Ohio Ct. App. 2025)
- State ex rel. Surafi v. Oldfield (Ohio Ct. App. 2025)
- State ex rel. Scales v. Fuller (Ohio Ct. App. 2025)
- Lester v. Boyer (Ohio Ct. App. 2025)
- Patituce v. Werner (Ohio Ct. App. 2025)
- State Ex Rel. Bluford v. Gallagher, Unpublished Decision (3-29-2001) (Ohio Ct. App. 2001)
- State v. Jones, Unpublished Decision (1-2-2001) (Ohio Ct. App. 2001)
- Dutton v. Sylvania Twn. Board of Zoning, Unpublished Decision (4-28-2000) (Ohio Ct. App. 2000)
- State v. Matia, Unpublished Decision (12-20-2000) (Ohio Ct. App. 2000)
- In the Matter of Facemyer, Unpublished Decision (12-22-2000) (Ohio Ct. App. 2000)
- State Ex Rel. O'Neal v. McCormick, Unpublished Decision (12-2-1999) (Ohio Ct. App. 1999)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
On appeal, appellant submits “evidence” that he did in fact file the motion in question in the court of common pleas on April 30, 1991. Similarly, appellee submits “evidence” that the motion was denied on May 14, 1991, and argues that the mandamus action is now moot.
In Miner v. Witt (1910), 82 Ohio St. 237, 92 N.E. 21, we allowed facts outside the record to show that a case had become moot. Accordingly, we find that the cause is moot, and on that basis we affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.